Slowbuscus - Builder App

[Slowbuscus]

Ingame name: Slowbuscus

Join date: September 15

Briefly describe all your creations: My creations are usually based on real things for example a train station, houses churchs, tend to be medium sized do big builds on request or when needed.

What worlds are the creations on: Recruit46

Links to screenshots of the creation: http://imgur.com/hbRZX
                                                  http://tinypic.com/r/2lntg60/6
                                                  http://imgur.com/yPXP9
                                                  http://imgur.com/Bd73M
                                                  http://imgur.com/5Es12,LadlS,pdLij,Exyt7
Names of players who helped contribute: Slowbuscus

What is your current rank in Opticraft ?: Recruit

Extra (Anything else you want to mention): This server is amazing hope it keeps running long after the buscus era.

Do you agree with our terms(http://www.opticraft.net/index.php?topic=3.0) ?: Indeed, i do

[blokey123]

Alpha said he was going to ban you if you did another application within that 5 day period. I suggest you get rid of it before he see's it.

[Victor1261]

Unfortunately, I still don't think any of these builds are big or detailed enough. I won't be the one rejecting it though.

P.S. Like Blokey said, I suggest you get rid of this before Alpha sees it. EDIT: I think it's too late! I just came on this topic and at the top I saw Alpha viewing it!

EDIT: Too late...

[gavin1928374655]

Slowbuscus I do like some of your builds....but alpha said you had to wait till June 5th to post another. It might be wise to take this down before he sees it.

[Alpha_Lance]

Rejected

1 week Ban.

[Tobs]

If you aren't going to be accepted the first four times, you wont be accepted the fith...
Spamming the forums with topics will not get you known the right way

[Spamarian]

Sorry, but where is the rule that you ban a person for posting builder applications?

[Xeadin]

If they post too many at once with little to no progress, it counts as spam. It takes up room and is highly unnecessary. We have had a few people that have done this sort of thing in the past, so this is not something new to us.

We like it when people post applications when they have taken their time-- we don't like it when people spam our forums with applications that show no progress. It's a sign of carelessness and that's what we do not want.

[Unholy_Gibbon]

Sorry, but where is the rule that you ban a person for posting builder applications?

Here:

• No spamming or double/triple posting - Use edit!

[Spamarian]

Maybe, you should recosinder the meaning of that phrase.
By posting applications, its not spamming.
I believe that this is immaturity that influences the judgements over people.

[Unholy_Gibbon]

7 apps (6 of which were made within the space of 24 hours) is spamming. Particularly when most of them didn't have any new builds added.
You can also see that he immediately reposted an app as soon as his previous one was rejected at 9:59:55pm May 31st.

[Spamarian]

So what?
We are here to accept or reject people.
He has no limit on applications. Neither somethign is referred on the appropriate topic about builder applications.
Some people dont know the procedure probably.
Let them know. That's why we are here.

[Xeadin]

He was reminded in all of his applications that he sent. He was told to take his time on his builds and heed to our standards-- as you can see, he did not. Even worse, he did not heed to our recommendations to him and continued spamming the same application in a few instances. That is unacceptable.

Yes, we do accept/ reject applications, but that's not the only thing. Content control is another thing to watch out for. If it's clear that they're not taking the time on their builds or they keep on spamming the same application over and over again, something has to be done to keep them from doing that.

I shouldn't have to make myself any clearer than this.

[morgosin]

He was reminded in all of his applications that he sent. He was told to take his time on his builds and heed to our standards-- as you can see, he did not. Even worse, he did not heed to our recommendations to him and continued spamming the same application in a few instances. That is unacceptable.

Yes, we do accept/ reject applications, but that's not the only thing. Content control is another thing to watch out for. If it's clear that they're not taking the time on their builds or they keep on spamming the same application over and over again, something has to be done to keep them from doing that.

I shouldn't have to make myself any clearer than this.

well said.