New guest world announcement!

[NotABronie]

Cons
People can steal builds, but there are already mods for that anyway (I've seen one that downloads and saves any chunk you walk in, while playing SMP), and if someone is going to steal a build, they'd hardly care about the mod rule.

Please excuse the poor chronology, but what do you mean by "steal builds"

[SonicHogSpeed]

Cons
People can steal builds, but there are already mods for that anyway (I've seen one that downloads and saves any chunk you walk in, while playing SMP), and if someone is going to steal a build, they'd hardly care about the mod rule.

Please excuse the poor chronology, but what do you mean by "steal builds"

He means that people can copy another's creation and claim it as their own on the server

[square_skull]

Yay!
Now i will be able to get leather & slime and stuff!

[NotABronie]

Cons
People can steal builds, but there are already mods for that anyway (I've seen one that downloads and saves any chunk you walk in, while playing SMP), and if someone is going to steal a build, they'd hardly care about the mod rule.

Please excuse the poor chronology, but what do you mean by "steal builds"

He means that people can copy another's creation and claim it as their own on the server

What Uber Fagitron 2000's...

[Mr_Mr_Mr]

95% done!

It's been 21 days since you've announced it's 95% done and it's still not out. Does this mean that you've been working on it for well over 1995 days? (21*95)

[TheWholeLoaf]

Remeber, they said that the seed the world was saved on wasnt any good so they've been spending time copying things over to another one.

[Nick3306]

95% done!

It's been 21 days since you've announced it's 95% done and it's still not out. Does this mean that you've been working on it for well over 1995 days? (21*95)

There are so many things wrong with this statement i dont know where to start....

[kagarium]

What about everything in the old guest world? Will we have a way of moving it without having to tear everything down and rebuilding it?

[SalsaInABowl]

Holy crap. Guys. Read the first page.

[Nhataley]

Holy crap. Guys. Read the first page.

I know right?

[Drunz]

Holy crap. Guys. Read the first page.

Not to be rude but Snipe, weren't you one of the ones whining about the same thing?

[SalsaInABowl]

Holy crap. Guys. Read the first page.

Not to be rude but Snipe, weren't you one of the ones whining about the same thing?

I wasn't talking about that, I was talking about how people still think the world was being deleted.

[clawstrider]

Please excuse the poor chronology, but what do you mean by "steal builds"

Yeah, sonic understood.

There is something you missed. You can cheat and find diamonds in the world and dig them up on the server.

If the world is removed, then they'll most likely put it up for download, like they did with the 1.8 world.

I already agreed that if a world is in use, it should not be put up for download. I was talking in reply to DK.

Claw, what are you talking about? We already know the pros and cons to it..
But have you not been reading anything here? No world is being deleted, so no world is being released.

Also, why did you quote me on that? It's got nothing to do with what I said.

You claimed that the 1.7 world being put up for download (After the world had been deleted) was "A mistake by Optical, it wasn't intentional.".
This world had already been deleted, after he put it up for download. I'm not entirely sure what you're talking about.
If you had read my quote, I agreed that after it is deleted (Are you saying that no worlds will ever be deleted ever again?) it should be put up for download.

Maybe my original post was a little hard to understand, but it was mostly in reply to:

Nick,
could you put the world for a free download on the fourms ( just before it gets put in)?
that would be great because ALOT of people would like a copy

saying that ONLY after a world is deleted, should it be put up for download. The thing that seemed to confuse most people was not reading:

May I ask why worlds that are not being used by the server should not be up for download?

The not bit. I was agreeing with you guys, not quite sure why it started this.

[CookieMaster]