Trusted World

[square_skull]

Hey opticrafters,
i have recently realised that some things in the guest world & member world are just
to hard to get sometimes (e.g. leather, due to a plugin which reduces spawning), so
i was thinking, why not make a trusted world with less restrictions which only trusted
and above can access?

Please tell me what you think about this by voting or posting

Thanks,
Square_Skull

[ComputerGameLPer]

No thanks, Trusteds are just members with a orange nametag and 1-2 extra things, why seperate trusteds and members?



-Edit this is most likely reponse to trusted+ resticted areas aswell, same deal (Except world is more major)

-Edit (#2) Rules should still be applied, mainly because just because someone were to be trusted, they can still greif

[tiggy26668]

If anything I'd much prefer to see a free build/creative world and only allow like builder+ on classic to use it

[Wyboth]

Builder + ... fuck.

[clawstrider]

If anything I'd much prefer to see a free build/creative world and only allow like builder+ on classic to use it

All my yes.

[Selkon_Hunter]

Edit (#2) Rules should still be applied, mainly because just because someone were to be trusted, they can still greif

I think they've even had mods that griefed. Your point is well made.

[SalsaInABowl]

Trusted world...just no. I can't even explain why we shouldn't, it's just self explanatory.

[TarynMai]

We dont want to separate the trusteds and members/guests. It would be unfair and rather inconvenient. How would you feel if the mods had their own world? Or the ops?

[zwaan111]

We dont want to separate the trusteds and members/guests. It would be unfair and rather inconvenient. How would you feel if the mods had their own world? Or the ops?

who sais they dont have one?

[TarynMai]

We dont lol.

[zwaan111]

We dont lol.

ah

proof it

[joshskiizz]

How do we show proof of something that doesn't exist? We don't have one.
And anything for Trusted only is a no.

[tiggy26668]

How do we show proof of something that doesn't exist? We don't have one.
And anything for Trusted only is a no.

well.... this is how......

*edit* you use a contrapositive =P
 and u kinda almost had it....

his argument: if a world exists for mods+, then mod+ has their own world.

ur argument: mod+ don't have a world, therefore a mod+ world doesn't exist =P

*edit edit* (double edit rawr)

u could also go with
his argument: if mod+ has their own world, then a world for mod+ exists

ur argument: a mod+ world doesn't exist, therefore mod+ don't have their own world.

gotta love logic....

[Morrison1996]

Can this be locked it has been discussed before. The answer then was a no so why would it be different now.

[square_skull]

ok, thanks everyone for their views,
i did not know this was discussed before though.

Thanks,
Square_Skull

p.s. could this topic be locked now please, seeing as the ansewer is clear?